Circular Polarization is a relatively untalked about subject on 11 Meters, perhaps this is the first time you have ever heard of such a thing. Most antennas are oriented to produce linear polarization – either horizontal or vertical polarization. Sometimes, a creative CBer will turn their beam at a 45 degree angle, half-way in between horizontal and vertical polarization. This results in a signal that is weaker than if the owner would have oriented their antenna the same (polarization) as their neighbor’s antenna. This is still a “linear” polarization.
It is known that if one station transmits a vertically polarized signal and the local receiving station is using a horizontally polarized antenna, this will result in a signal that is 20db weaker at the receiving station’s receiver! Matching the polarization’s is a good idea for maximum signal strengths between two stations. When talking “Skip” (Dxing), you might think you need to make sure you are using the same polarization as the distant station for maximum signal strength. In actuality, it might be impossible to match the polarization of the Distant station – this is because when the signal “hops” off the ionosphere – it’s polarization usually gets rotated – at a random amount.
(((If you are unsure how signals “skip” great distances, check out the “Angle of Radiation” section for more insight.)))
To make matter worse, the polarization does not maintain a set polarization during a period of time. When the incoming signals polarization matches your antennas polarization, you get the strongest signal strength possible. And when it is 90 degrees different (meaning, say your listening on vertical polarization and the signal is coming in on horizontal) you get the weakest signal possible. As the polarization swaps between matching your antennas polarization and varying from it, you will hear the signal “fade” (known as “QSB” to Amateur Radio Operators). Sometimes it will fade in and out fast – sometimes is will fade out and say down in strength, This is just one condition that causes fade that you can help eliminate. Just so you know, there are a few other phenomena that cause signals to fade. The two other major things are:
- The reflectiveness of the ionosphere – The ionosphere isn’t a perfect reflector, and perhaps is varying the signal quality. This is one type of fading you don’t have any control over!
- “Multipath” fading – As the signal travels from the distant (DX) station, the signal takes more than one path. This results in the signal arriving at the antenna at slightly different times. Does this sound familiar? If you read the section on “Yagi”, you know that if signals arriving at the driven element out-of-phase results in signal cancellation, which results in signal loss. As the effect of multipath varies, it causes signal fade. There isn’t too much you can do about this either! A good beam with a high Front-to-back and Front-to-side ratio can help combat this. Multipath can cause signals to fade out almost entirely!Another situation that you might not be able to match your polarization with the receiving station is that, you are talking to more than one local station, and they have opposite polarizations (i.e. one station is using vertical and the other is using horiztonal). When you are listening, you could flip between polarizations to match the transmitting station for maximum signal, but when you transmit — well, I hope you see the problem. Perhaps you can flip your antenna switch between horizontal and vertical about 10000000 times a second and neither station will notice.
So, what we know now is, we would like to match our antenna polarization to the station we are talking to. This is easy when we are talking to a local station, where our signal travels along the ground. If we have a beam that is capable of both horizontal and vertical polarization, then we just switch between the two. Now, how do we deal with this random polarization change of “Skipping” signals? Simple, we make our antenna receive and transmit horizontal, vertical and EVERY angle between horizontal and vertical polarization. This is known as “Circular Polarization”. Once we have set our antenna up for circular polarization – it will be really effective for dealing with talking to vertical and horizontally polarized stations and for reducing signal fade when talking to distant stations!
I mentioned the two other conditions that cause signal fade to let you know, it (fade) can’t easily be eliminated, so don’t think you did something wrong when you still hear signal fade on “skip” signals with your new circular polarized antenna.
Compared to horizontal and vertical polarization, you can see, it encompassed every angle. As the signal leaves the antenna, it is actually spinning, not maintaining a set angle. This is good because no matter what polarization the receiving station is using, your signal will still come in at the same intensity. On receive, the same thing is true, no matter what polarization a signal is coming in at, it will still have the same intensity. When facing the same direction as the antenna is pointed, a signal that rotates clock-wise as it leaves the antenna is known as “Right Handed Circular polarization”. As signal that rotates counter-clock wise is known as “Left Handed Circular polarization”.
Suitable Antennas for C.P. Circular Polarization
Now, lets talk about what antennas we can use to transmit and receive Circular Polarization. (I am abbreviating Circular Polarization = “CP” from here out!)
Mainly, only dual-polarity beam antennas are good for this. Either yagi, quads or hybrids that can produce two polarization’s can be used. If your beam has two coax connections on it, you should be good. The Moonraker 4, Moonraker 6, Shooting Star, Comet, PDL II, are some that I can think of that will work good. It doesn’t matter how many elements your beam has, by the way. Sorry to all the people reading, wanting to make their vertical radiate CP. You need two opposed polarization. I can’t guarantee results from Jo-Gunn Star series. I am not entirely convinced those antennas produce two polarization’s that are 90 degrees opposed to each other (exact opposites). Man, I seem to pick on that antenna! Sorry! However, I was just reading their site, the “V-Series” does NOT radiate a CP signal.
The magic, how it’s done. Its quite simple – you just need to feed both polarization simultaneously – but most importantly – one polarization must be fed 90 degrees out-of-phase with the other one. What does this mean, you might be thinking, This is similar to co-phasing, in that you have to make up a special coax harness to get everything to work correctly. In the case of co-phased beams, you use equal lengths from the “T” connector so each antenna is fed in-phase. In the case of CP, you want to make one leg longer than the other, so there is a timing delay in which one polarization receives the energy first. Some operators already have switch boxes that can switch to using both horizontal and vertical polarization at the same time. This does not produce CP, as CP requires very precise lengths of 50,75 and 95 Ohm coax. Whether your SWR meter indicates it or not, SWR will double when paralleling horizontal and vertical polarization when using 50 Ohm coax. To achieve the proper 90 degree phase difference, you must make one leg of the harness 1/4 Wavelength longer than the other. See figure 1 for details. For best results, coax harness lengths should be verified electrically for length. This can be done with a M.F.J. SWR meter or similiar device.
I suggest feeding the vertical polarization feedpoint first. This will produce right hand polarization. If all DX stations agree to use right hand CP, then losses can be avoided when other stations running CP use opposite CP . If stations are using opposite handedness CP, they will experience the normal 20db reduction found in crossed linear polarization. So, it will be helpful if everyone that chooses to do CP sticks to one sense (hopefully clockwise – or right handed). Also, notice the 75 Ohm matching sections of coax used, like when co-phasing antennas. Since paralleling two antennas will produce a lower impedance at the “T” connector, we must use 75 Ohm matching sections to correct the mismatch!
This is a single harness and is a setup for running CP full-time. Although CP has its advantages, it also has its disadvantages. First off, you must know that you are likely to receive more “noise” on your receiver when using CP to receive. This is a side effect from using CP to receive. Secondly, you must also know your signal will 3db lower when using CP to transmit. This is because power (watts) is split exactly at the “T” connector to each antenna, meaning if you are using 4 watts, 2 watts will go to one polarization and 2 watts will go to the other polarization. From reading this website, you should already know that doubling your output power results in a 3db gain in your signal – so it stands to reason that cutting your power in half will result in a reduction of -3db. The splitting of your power to each polarization results in a signal that is 3db lower to most linear polarized receiving stations (but NOT to other CP receiving stations, they pick up all your power).
Although your signal will be 3db lower, the effect of using CP to combat signal fade will sometimes be a greater advantage than that losted 3db.
Since at any one time it is hard to say which is best (horizontal, vertical or CP) when talking “Skip”, it is best to be diverse, and have the ability to switch between all three at any one time. You will probably find that when receiving, its best to switch between vertical and horizontal to find the best signal and when transmitting, the receiving station will receive the least amount of fade on your signal if you transmit with CP. When talking to local stations (groundwave) that have opposite polarization’s, it is definitely to your advantage to use CP.
So that wraps up the talk for now. I want to get feedback on this page and make some updates. I was working on a simple switching system that allows you to switch between vertical, horizontal and CP from the shack – but the solution is not so simple. Hopefully, in the near future I will have a good solution to this problem. I am open to suggestions…
Article originally available at http://signalengineering.com/ultimate/circular_polarization.html
Enjoyed your article on ‘Circular Polarization’. I did something similar for a 6 meter CP Beam using Driven Elements and crossed Reflectors EXCEPT I placed both 75 Ohm 1/4 Wave Matching Sections to the Antenna Feeds instead of the configuration shown in your Cross Polarization Phasing Harness Diagram. I used it extensively in the 1990’s during several Scatter/Meteor Prop events and found it entirely satisfactory. I put it away but am thinking of rebuilding it when I came across your article looking for any improvements I might make.
When I first built it, It occurred to me that I wished both antennas to present the same Z to the Main TX feed line. As you know Quadrature line sections transform the Z of the antenna as presented to the main feed line and while the ‘Traditional’ Circular Phasing Harness works, I seemed to get better Symmetry by essentially ‘extending’ one leg of the 50 Ohm Tee Connector with a 50 Ohm Quadrature Section instead of possibly having Standing Waves on the 50 Ohm Quadrature Section connected directly to the antenna. The Phase remained in Quad but the Z Transformation occurred in the same Vector as the opposite Driven Element.
Simply put: I swapped the position of the 50 and 75 Ohm Quadrature stubs.
Rotating the Dipoles between Horizontal and Vertical showed no change in VSWR at a fixed height and the receiving station verifying the signals in the Far Field detected no difference in the Signal Strength when switching Polarities, which I took to be a good sign. My VNA showed good phase balance between the legs (+88/-92) for a spread of 4 Degrees. I could likely have gotten it closer but UHF connectors are NOT Ideal in that respect. Perhaps I rebuild it with all N Connectors.
Curious if you have any thoughts or criticisms to my line of thinking.
73 de KC4SJC
Follow up to my last comment: My VNA Phase notation has an ‘error’. I omitted the 50 Ohm stub calculation ( I have three notes from the original design as I measured all THREE stubs individually. The notation was for the two 75 Ohm Quad Stubs EXCLUDING the 90 degree 50 Ohm stub…so the feeds were 178 degrees for the vertical and 92 for the horizontal.
In those days it wasn’t really a VNA but a Vector Voltmeter measurement of individual stubs. VVMs dont lakie varying impedances on the probe tees…