<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing the Vertical Antenna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna</link>
	<description>amateur radio - articles and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:56:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Bohme</title>
		<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Bohme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-6681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi ,  Let us also have the weight comparisons for these listed antennae. 
Emil ZS6EGB]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,  Let us also have the weight comparisons for these listed antennae.<br />
Emil ZS6EGB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Bohmw</title>
		<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-6680</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Bohmw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-6680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi , Would be very interested in the analysis esp when it comes to the AV-640. Do operate from a Butternut HF6V and
would like to see your comparison soon. R/ds Emil ZS6EGB]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi , Would be very interested in the analysis esp when it comes to the AV-640. Do operate from a Butternut HF6V and<br />
would like to see your comparison soon. R/ds Emil ZS6EGB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hodges</title>
		<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-4843</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-4843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have nothing further]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing further</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hodges</title>
		<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-4842</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/77/choosing-the-vertical-antenna#comment-4842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though your comparison of vertical antennas looks complete it slants the information in favor of GAP.  For example, when band width is noted for the Cushcraft R-8 for 30 meters is says &quot;50&quot; and for the GAP it states &quot;All&quot;.  In reality, at least in the USA, 50 is all we are allowed to use (10.100 - 10.150).  This is also noted with other bands as well.   A new ham would look at your information and make an assessment based upon &quot;wording&quot; and I believe that is unfair.  When one plublishes figures it should reflect the same information or explain the differences per international requirements.  In effect your presentation lacks subjectivity.

73,

Mike / w5ehm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though your comparison of vertical antennas looks complete it slants the information in favor of GAP.  For example, when band width is noted for the Cushcraft R-8 for 30 meters is says &#8220;50&#8243; and for the GAP it states &#8220;All&#8221;.  In reality, at least in the USA, 50 is all we are allowed to use (10.100 &#8211; 10.150).  This is also noted with other bands as well.   A new ham would look at your information and make an assessment based upon &#8220;wording&#8221; and I believe that is unfair.  When one plublishes figures it should reflect the same information or explain the differences per international requirements.  In effect your presentation lacks subjectivity.</p>
<p>73,</p>
<p>Mike / w5ehm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
