<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kenwood TH-F7E vs ICOM IC-E90</title>
	<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/55/kenwood-th-f7e-vs-icom-ic-e90</link>
	<description>Amateur Radio Experience</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 11:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/55/kenwood-th-f7e-vs-icom-ic-e90#comment-2987</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.iw5edi.com/ham-radio/55/kenwood-th-f7e-vs-icom-ic-e90#comment-2987</guid>
					<description>I have to agree with you on this, the Kenwood is a nicer radio to use. I have big fingers and find pretty much all the new handheld's buttons to hard to use, so the difference isn't that big of a deal. Nice article.

73 Dave WA3YAY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with you on this, the Kenwood is a nicer radio to use. I have big fingers and find pretty much all the new handheld&#8217;s buttons to hard to use, so the difference isn&#8217;t that big of a deal. Nice article.</p>
<p>73 Dave WA3YAY
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
